Having earned a minor in Criminology/Criminal Justice in school, I find the judicial system quite interesting. I've sat in juvenile court hearings before (wait - that sounds bad - in the audience) but have never seen an adult jury trial in person. That was going to change when I got the bittersweet surprise a few weeks ago of a jury summons. I really am not 100% sure what I'm allowed to say about specifics of the case yet so I'll be fairly broad.
When the day of my summons came, I had to be at the courthouse by 7:45 AM which is way too early. When I arrived, I waited in line for the security screening to open. Listening to peoples' conversations was interesting. One person, an incredibly close minded individual, kept whining about TSA screenings in airports. I get it. It can be a slight annoyance to go through security at the airport but it's for a reason and it's really not that big of a deal. No one is "treating you like a terrorist" when you go through airport security.
There were also people way too excited to be there that early in the morning
and also those looking like they would rather jump in a pool of lava than be at jury duty.
Once the loads of potential jurors got through security, we headed into the basement and filled out some basic paperwork which would be looked over by attorneys if/when we were brought into a courtroom. More waiting. The person in charge of the jury room was upbeat and knew most people didn't want to be there and tried to make it as least painful as possible. After a quick introduction and thanking us 200 times for being there, a judge asked if we had any questions. People then proceeded to waste time and ask irrelevant questions to the judge having nothing to do with the day.
After watching a rather long video explaining sort of how the process works, the first group of randomly drawn 30 people went to a courtroom. I was not picked so waited some more.
A little bit
later, 14 more people got called and I was one of them. We walked to a jury holding room while attorneys looked
over our papers. We then went into the courtroom and sat in the jury box. The attorneys asked
the group some overarching questions and either called on people or waited for volunteers to respond. I got a little caught up in it but then started to realize what they were trying to figure out from peoples' answers. One of the potential jury members was clearly trying to get
out of it by saying she didn't like judging others and wouldn't feel comfortable
doing it here (she ended up being on the jury). Some people told some really personal stories in response to the questions and others had answers having nothing to do with the question.
Once questioning was done, the judge started dismissing
people and before I knew it, I was one of the final 6 jurors who would hear the
case. I actually really liked the 5 other people. There were 3 guys and 3 girls with a wide age range and background and they all took the process seriously.
After a break, we were escorted back to the courtroom and listened to opening statements. The
prosecutor then called a witness and we examined three pieces of evidence.
Following an incredibly long
and drawn out 1.5 hour lunch break, we headed back into the jury box and listened to more from the original witness.
Next the defense called a witness and
asked them the same question over and over. When the defense's witness was talking, it was all great information but had nothing to do with the charge. The defense really did not have much of a case besides trying to make the jurors feel bad for the defense (which we all did).
The prosecutor then cross examined the witness followed by the defendant being
called to the stand. Both sides questioned the defendant and after a few more breaks, we heard closing statements.
The jurors went back to the all too
familiar holding room and waited some more and then finally got to discuss the
case. It was a pretty easy decision for all of us but we did feel really
sympathetic towards the defendant. Although the defendant's lawyer did a great job in their closing statements making us feel bad for their client, at the end of the day, the defendant broke the law and
giving an exception to them would mean everyone should get an exception. Our verdict? Guilty.
 |
| Courthouse |
All of us jurors agreed we were glad we were not involved in sentencing because the defendant seemed to be a good person who just made one bad choice. We were instructed multiple times not to take into consideration what would happen to the defendant. Our job was to simply say if they were guilty of the crime or not. Because of a law class I took, I had a general idea of what the punishment would be which was later confirmed when I got home and looked it up.
So overall a long day but it
was quite interesting to be a juror in a criminal case. I could never imagine being
involved in a grand jury and having to decide on something much more intense.
That's all for now. Bye.